Items / Reference templates / BP007

REF-BP007-2

C03 independence · C03.2 independent vs mutually exclusive · target easy, CD3 · split val · reference items carry their template's native demand and difficulty

Pending

Events A and B each have positive probability: P(A) = 0.4 and P(B) = 0.5. A and B are mutually exclusive. Which statement follows?

  1. AIndependence cannot be determined without knowing P(A or B).MISC-OTHER
  2. BA and B cannot be independent, because knowing A occurred makes B impossible.Key
  3. CA and B must also be independent, because mutually exclusive events do not affect each other.M-INDEP-VS-EXCL
  4. DP(A and B) = 0.2, since independence and exclusivity give the same product rule.M-ADD-NOT-MULT

Explanation (as written by the item's author)

Mutually exclusive events with positive probability are always dependent: P(A and B) = 0, but independence would require P(A and B) = P(A)P(B) > 0.

Distractors and the misconception each claims to execute
OptionCodeCatalogue meaningAuthor's rationale
AMISC-OTHERDistractor is not attributable to any catalogued misconception (itself a quality signal).Claims more information is needed when the given facts already settle it.
B (key)KEYMutual exclusivity forces P(B|A) = 0 while P(B) > 0, which is the definition of dependence.
CM-INDEP-VS-EXCLTreats mutually exclusive events as independent, or independence as exclusivity.The classic conflation of exclusivity with independence.
DM-ADD-NOT-MULTAdds probabilities of independent events where multiplication is required (or vice versa).Applies the product rule to events that cannot co-occur.

Quality flags · 0 fired

  • duplicate options (integrity) not firedTwo options are identical after normalisation.
  • numerically equal options (integrity) not firedTwo options denote the same number (e.g. 0.5 and 1/2 and 50%).
  • missing options (integrity) not firedFewer than four non-empty options.
  • key out of range (integrity) not firedThe keyed answer is a probability outside [0, 1] (or a percentage > 100).
  • all none of above (cue) not firedAn option is 'all/none of the above' or 'both A and B'.
  • key uniquely longest (cue) not firedThe key is the longest option by at least 20% (length cue).
  • key uniquely shortest (cue) not firedThe key is the shortest option by at least 20%.
  • distractor out of range (cue) not firedA distractor is a probability outside [0, 1]; it can be eliminated without the construct.
  • absolute terms in distractors (cue) not firedDistractors (only) use absolute terms such as always/never/must/proves, a known cue that they are wrong.
  • stem option overlap cue (cue) not firedThe key alone repeats a content word from the stem.
  • grammatical mismatch (cue) not firedThe stem ends in 'a'/'an' and some options do not agree with it.
  • key is hedged only (cue) not firedOnly the key contains hedging language (may/might/plausibly/likely).
  • numeric middle key (info) not firedOptions are numeric and the key is one of the two middle values. Informational; tested at set level against the 0.5 chance rate.
  • negative stem (style) not firedStem uses NOT/EXCEPT/LEAST phrasing.
  • overlong stem (style) not firedStem exceeds 110 words.
  • inconsistent numeric format (style) not firedNumeric options mix fractions, decimals and percentages, or use differing decimal precision.
  • unit mismatch (style) not firedOptions carry different units.
  • option length imbalance (style) not firedLongest option is more than 2.5x the shortest.
  • rationale value mismatch (metadata) not firedA distractor's stated rationale computes a value ('= x') that is not the option it is attached to: the distractor does not actually execute the misconception it claims.

Validator output

Not a numeric item: no program-of-thought check applies.

Answering probes

Probes not yet run for this item.

Shortcut results

Construct-free heuristics (probability on the key; chance 0.25)
HeuristicP(key)
longest option0.00
shortest option0.00
convergence1.00
stem overlap0.00
numeric middle0.25
hedged option0.00
position prior0.00

Provenance and generation trace

Method
reference_template /
Model
none
Source
parameterised template T-C03.2-excl, written by the AssessAI build agent (Claude); no external item bank; not human-reviewed
Prompt hash
LLM calls · cost
0 · $0.00000 · 0.0 s
Parser notes
none